Wednesday 4 May 2016

I'm a deep rooted Tory yet my vote's heading off to the Women's Equality party. Here's the reason



Almost two years back, Suzanne Moore utilized these pages to require the foundation of a women's activist gathering. She refered to old liberal dreams with curve new popular expressions – "disassembling neoliberalism" – and the case of Sweden's ultra-communist Feminist Initiative.

A women's activist and deep rooted Tory, I answered in The Telegraph regretting the thought: "There is, indeed, a gathering devoted to 'disassembling neoliberalism' and battling starkness. It's known as the Labor party ... Woman's rights never has, and never ought to be, a homogeneous development. My http://pregame.com/members/mehndidesignimages/userbio/default.aspxwomen's liberation is straightforwardly fixing to a pledge to meritocracy and individual thriving … so in the event that her stupendous new women's activist gathering commences by nationalizing private property, I'm not really going to have the capacity to join."

The vast majority of all, I expected that centering women's activist vitality on a fledging gathering would divert my era from the genuine issue: expanding ladies' representation in the political gatherings that really hold power.

This Thursday, I'll be trying to go back on what was said. I'll take after Suzanne into the surveying corner, and stamp my cross against the name of Sophie Walker, the Women's Equality party contender for London leader. She isn't flawless, nor is her new gathering, however its quick development has astonished every one of us. However, like never before, I'm persuaded that without a solid outside challenge the Tory general population – like a great part of the Labor party – will keep on blithely overlook British ladies' fretfulness for another political arrangement.

It's not only the quantity of times that, at Tory parties, I've been taken for a secretary (the late experience of Isabel Hardman, released as "totty" at a work occasion, astounded nobody); nor the minor party names who have recommended I remain for decision, then recorded the times of the week on which their spouses are away. Nor is it the old story – one of numerous – of the choice board seat who saluted his group on picking a non-white man: "at any rate it's not a bleeding lady". In the event that one thing hosts persuaded me that the Tory get-together is still a shut shop, it's the amazing ascent of Zac Goldsmith.

Goldsmith's defects and merits have been talked about somewhere else finally. What's reasonable is that, as a political hopeful, he's fair. Huge numbers of those shortcomings are unfortunate attributes instead of sins: that normal reserve, just about modesty, over and over again deciphered as lack of approachability. It's not Goldsmith's blame that his extremely rich person father James was for some time connected with the shadowy gossip of rightist upsets, in spite of the fact that in the circumstances it was an odd choice to follow Sadiq Khan's radical previous brother by marriage (what is Imran Khan up to in Pakistan these days, one marvels). We as a whole have humiliating families.

On arrangement, nonetheless, Goldsmith is a wreck. He would scrap transport paths, we are told, however when and how appears to be indistinct. Both significant hopefuls have pandered, indecently, to the cycling entryway: of them, be that as it may, just Goldsmith veers from thrashing the "preposterousness" of cyclists on the right-inclining Nick Ferrari radio show to promising to free the street of HGVs in his ace cycling Action Plan (so long, Tory responsibility to little organizations). Similarly as with those flawed Tamil handouts, Goldsmith's issue isn't just that he tailors his pitch to the accepted biases of every group of onlookers (however Owen Jones is correct that better than average Tories ought to reprove this current); it's that he continues getting got.

None of these things makes Zac Goldsmith naturally unfit to look for office. Yet, it's difficult to envision a 6th structure expellee, editorial manager just of his uncle's pet magazine, accomplishing high office in the Tory party from some other foundation. His best trick was subsidized from his own particular pocket.

The issue is not that benefit ought to prohibit individuals from office – like Goldsmith, both the head administrator and the present chairman are Old Etonians; both are shrewd and able legislators – yet that it so frequently permits the fair to skim in front of the gifted. Khan, as well, has a long history of slicing his political material to suit the occasion. A Tory competitor with demonstrated cleaves may have uncovered this, as well as offered a tenable option.

Essentially, despite everything we battle to envision ladies in force, as much as we likewise battle with class or race. It's nothing unexpected that tip top instruction, and parental penances to accomplish it, help you excel, yet look around the Tory top table and you'll see scions of Eton, not Wycombe Abbey or James Allen's Girls' School. This may not be much solace to numerous dark, LGBT or average workers ladies, however it's a stark measure of the sexual orientation premium.

Regardless i'm not persuaded that the Women's Equality party, notwithstanding its aspiration, is more than a weight bunch taking on the appearance of a political gathering. It appears to be improbable, for instance, that its endeavors did much to spare the British transport police's sex violations unit, when the writer Rosamund Urwin has worked longer and harder on the issue. In any case, Walker's gathering has effectively astounded me by building a cross-party coalition while concentrating on the issue of representation. It has made clamor. As a weight bunch, it is working.

I presented myself on the primary day of optional school by declaring to my schoolmates that I had two extraordinary interests: Elizabeth I and the Tory party. About 20 years after the fact, I'm at the dramatic finish phases of a PhD on Elizabeth I's scholarly life, and I'm excessively acquainted with Tory meetings. Maybe the main genuine distinction is that I've at long last taken in the basics of what not to say to 12-year-olds. So this week points an existential change, not a silly impulse. I've been a Conservative since I have faith in antiquated thoughts of meritocracy. Perhaps it's the gathering's swing to make up for lost time.

David Cameron has utilized PM's inquiries to tirelessly challenge the Labor pioneer, Jeremy Corbyn, over his connections to radical gatherings with bigoted perspectives.

The executive turned the week after week session on its head as he disregarded Corbyn's inquiries regarding household arrangement and rather requested four times that he pull back comments identifying with Hamas and Hezbollah.

"I'm anxious he must do this once again," Cameron said, before cheering Conservative MPs, who will trust the assault can amplify the gathering's odds in tomorrow's races. "He alluded to Hamas and Hezbollah as his companions – would they say they are your companions or not?

"Since those associations in their constitutions have confidence in aggrieving and murdering Jews, they are racist associations, they are supremacist associations, he should stand up and say they are not his companions."

Corbyn over and over reacted by saying http://www.dead.net/member/mehndidesignimagesLabor was an against supremacist party that would not endure discrimination against Jews, but rather neglected to specifically pull back his past remarks about Hamas and Hezbollah.

Rather, he said that he didn't support of either association, including: "Any individual who submits supremacist acts or is racist is not a companion of mine."

On the eve of the mayoralty decisions in London, Cameron additionally laid into the Labor hopeful, Sadiq Khan, who he blamed for an "example of conduct" in imparting stages to people with fanatic perspectives.

"He imparted a stage to Sajil Shahid, the man who prepared the instigator of the 7/7 assaults and blamed the US for bringing 9/11 on themselves. He imparted a stage to a radical who called for Jews to be suffocated in the sea."

Shahid has allegedly called for viciousness against British troops and run a preparation camp in Pakistan where known terrorists figured out how to make bombs and fire rocket-moved projectiles.

One of his "graduates" was said to be Mohammad Sidique Khan, who drove the pack of four suicide aircraft on the deadliest terrorist assault ever dedicated in Britain on 7 July 2005.

Corbyn hit back, blaming Cameron for spreading Khan, and indicating out that Sulaiman Ghani, who the head administrator already highlighted as a radical with connections the Labor mayoral cheerful, had additionally been imagined with the Conservative applicant, Zac Goldsmith.

Cameron said Khan had showed up with Ghani nine times, and said he was a man who portrayed ladies as subservient to men and who communicated disagreeable perspectives about gay individuals.

Cameron's assault came after Corbyn got to be overwhelmed in a discrimination against Jews emergency after his nearby political associate, Ken Livingstone, made disputable comments about Hitler and Israel that brought about him being suspended from the gathering.

The Labor pioneer, who was blamed for neglecting to act rapidly enough in suspending his companion, set up an investigation into discrimination against Jews drove by the previous Liberty chief Shami Chakrabarti.
BBC News arrangements to reserve £1m a year to select crippled writers as a major aspect of an arrangement to enhance the differences of its workforce.

In a meeting with staff on Wednesday, BBC head of http://mehndidesignimages.hazblog.com/news, James Harding, sketched out arrangements to designate more ladies, individuals with incapacities and those from dark, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) foundations into senior occupations.

His comments come a week after the BBC in general vowed that a large portion of its 21,000-in number workforce and authority would be female by 2020, 15% BAME and 8% handicapped.

The BBC has so far attempted to achieve focuses on differences set in 2014 by direct broad Tony Hall. The Labor MP and previous society pastor David Lammy blamed the company for moving too gradually, saying "talk has not been coordinated by genuine advancement".

In a discourse to staff, Harding said: "The initiative and administration of BBC News needs more ladies and more dark individuals, more Asian and ethnic minority individuals, more individuals with handicaps, more individuals from a more extensive assortment of social foundations and more youngsters. In the last couple of years, we have had a perceptible effect to what the BBC looks and seems like on air. I'd say it's insufficient, but rather we have done a ton. I won't shake off a rundown of names, however investigate or a listen to the news and you'll see."

He included: "We must give more occupations and more senior ones for incapacitated columnists."

Harding's division has been scrutinized for the current week for selecting an outcast, Dominic O'Connell as business moderator on Radio 4's Today program.

The recommendations to enlist more incapacitated columnists crosswise over BBC News have been submitted for endorsement to the BBC's official board.

Harding, selected in August 2013, likewise declared the arrangement of another "under-30s board" to work with his senior administration board "to guarantee more youthful voices are heard as well as are molding our future". The new board, made up of delegates from every division, is to begin in September.

The arrangements to enhance differing qualities come in front of an administration white paper to restore the BBC's regal sanction anticipated that would examine assorted qualities is relied upon to be distributed as ahead of schedule as one week from now.

The BBC has discharged a summery new trailer to advance the up and coming dispatch of Chris Evans' new-look Top Gear.

The trailer opens with Evans and previous Friends star and co-host, Matt LeBlanc, being invited to Blackpool by its chairman in the pouring precipitation.

The clasp then slices to sunnier climes the Top Gear group have chatted with visitors including Tinie Tempah, Texas artist Sharleen Spiteri, and Seasick Steve.

It is soundtracked by Dodgy's 1990s hit Staying Out for the Summer.

The trailer will make a big appearance on TV on BBC1 at 9pm, airing amongst EastEnders and MasterChef, and at the same time on BBC2.

It is the third trailer dispatched to advance the arrival of the new BBC2 motoring appear, because of start airing in the not so distant future.

You might be excused for not having known about Nick Gibb until the previous few days. He has been a political anorak since his high schoolers, and was a bookkeeper before turning into a MP in 1997. At present he is the schools priest, working under Nicky Morgan.

Ok yes, that ought to ring a chime.

Whenever Morgan, put into training to quiet things down after the Maoist rule of Michael Gove (the joke is David Cameron's own), confronted an antagonistic instructors' gathering a week ago, somebody inquired as to whether she or Gibb was responsible for strategy. She called her challenger "sexist", not a noteworthy answer from a bureau pastor.

The purpose for the instructor's correspond is that Morgan is emollient, however Gibb is grasped by the clique of meticulousness and the column over Sats tests for six-and seven-year-olds. It incited some guardians to demonstrate their dedication to their kids' instruction by taking them out of school this week in challenge. They have their reasons, yet we appear to live during a time held by unreasonability.

The rights and wrongs of testing 10-year-olds on modular verbs

Letters: Nicky Morgan has neglected to get a handle on the essential certainty that marking dialect is not the same as utilizing it adequately

Perused more

Gibb was not exactly sufficiently thorough to finish a Sats language structure test question set for 11-year-olds when tested by the BBC's Martha Kearney on Tuesday. Kearney laughed with happiness when he speculated off-base. Lift by his own particular petard, as a Gibb-prepared six-year-old would put it.

In any case, Gibb is a 55-year-old Tory on the libertarian wing of the gathering, a partner of Hague, then of Portillo, sufficiently exacting not to serve under IDS (insufficient GCSEs, Iain), and schools serve twice since 2010. A Kent linguistic use school kid who moved to Roundhay punctuation turned-extensive in working class Leeds (did he recognize that Margaret Thatcher rolled out the improvement?), he is a champion of phonics (not reasonable for all) and of meticulousness. Somebody unkindly released the comment that he would favor an Oxbridge graduate without an educator preparing authentication (PGCE) showing material science than somebody from "one of the waste colleges" with one.

That is such a trash comment, I could sob. Say after me Nick, that Apple's Sir Jonathan Ive, a standout amongst the most powerful architects of our times, examined modern configuration at Newcastle Poly, now Northumbria University. There are bounty all the more such gifts developing (and instructing) at a number of our "junk" colleges. Self importance from any semblance of Maidstone Grammar and Durham University's Gibb (he read law) has done as much as anything to injure the once forceful British modern base. They looked down on Stephenson and Brunel as well. Maybe the new influx of Ms Brunels will turn things around.

All things considered, I have some sensitivity for Gibb's protestation about the absence of thoroughness in quite a bit of what our children realize. For my situation it is grandchildren and awesome nieces nowadays. Some of it is innovative and brilliant, stunning me with its development and refinement. Outsiders beat into accommodation methodically adapting at times wonder about it.

In any case, I realize that universal alliance tables more than once highlight significant shortcomings in the fundamental abilities of English and maths and that, as so frequently in our sort of society, it is poor people and helpless who are slightest all around served. Their "neediness of aspiration" – as the considerable exchange unionist, Ernest Bevin, put it – is strengthened by society's detachment.

You don't should have the capacity to include or duplicate in the event that you have a number cruncher? Alright in the event that you say as much, yet you may not generally have one. It must disabled person not to realize that 3x17 is 51 when you're scoring at the base left-hand corner of the bar dartboard. Put another way, when we lived in suburbia of Washington DC, my 10-year-old experienced a level of maths he didn't meet again back in London until he was 16. Gibb says we are three years behind the Chinese at 15. Startling stuff.

The inquiry here is, not surprisingly, how would we best improve things? Norms, not structures, was David Blunkett's mantra at training (1997-2001), however this administration is by all accounts tossing both difficulties at instructors in what strikes me as a closed minded way, one scholarly methodically, you may say.

I was appalled when George Osborne (what's it to do with him?) reported that all schools must get to be foundations. Shouldn't something be said about decision for guardians and neighborhood powers? Why are institute chains falling flat as well, as the Gove-picked controller, Sir Michael Wilshaw, dissented?

It has the signs of another Andrew ("no top-down change") Lansley debacle, intensified by the entirely phenomenal choice to supplant guardian governors with "prepared" experts. Gibb himself is not a guardian. In the event that he was he may know it is regularly the guardians who truly know where a school is falling flat and what ought to be done about it.

The professionalization of everything (more often than not for a charge) is one more of the weakening indecencies of our time. No big surprise guardians are restless about their child rearing aptitudes, let alone about regardless of whether Alice and Timothy will be ready to contend with adolescents in Shanghai. Much to their dismay that Silicon Valley apply autonomy are endeavoring to make every one of them unemployed.

It is likewise no big surprise the children get restless when stood up to (at six!) with split digraphs and polysyllabic words in their Sats test. On the other hand that they are such http://mehndidesignimages.beepworld.de/anxious wrecks when they go to college that they force "safe spaces" and "no stage" arrangements in which they can be shielded from unsettling thoughts. Gibb appears to have the same issue, and he's 55.

How about we not go there today. I don't care for testing six-and seven-year-olds, a considerable lot of whom are youthful for an assortment of reasons and don't should be disheartened by split digraphs, whatever they are. Kids go to class prior in Britain than in a few nations where they appear to accomplish better guidelines later on.

So reports that some are hinting at trouble at the Sats test are hence justifiable. It is the occupation of guardians and instructors, working serenely together, to simplicity such fears. Other kids will cruise through the tests, obviously, and crow about it. That is bad for them either. Six is excessively youthful, making it impossible to wield the cosh.

Educators and guardians, not Nicky and Nick, are the way to an effectively instructed tyke. By and by, I would stress more over what screen time is doing to their forces of focus (it's not doing much for mine) and book-perusing propensities. On the other hand is that antiquated as well? We'll discover.

Be that as it may, brighten up. The previous evening my significant other and I saw a tasteless creation of Marlowe's Doctor Faustus at the theater. Since Kit Harington – Jon Snow of Game of Thrones acclaim – was assuming the title part, the spot was pressed with boisterous youngsters. Magnificent for another era of theatergoers, as Lyn Gardner contends. Marlowe's Elizabethan exposition, rich and distinctive, more likely than not been a significant stun for some of them, more so than the performers getting their pack off. In any case, they were all still there after the interim, much fire

"Unconcious, systemic predisposition" in the film business is to be faulted for the absence of ladies in coordinating and screenwriting parts, as indicated by the main association of UK film executives.

A report dispatched by Directors UK found that somewhere around 2005 and 2014, only 13.6% of British movies were coordinated by ladies, and that exclusive 14.6% of those movies had a female screenwriter.

The association is calling for sex equality out in the open financing, indicating accomplishment in Sweden after a comparable model was presented.

On the off chance that you work in the film business, we need to get notification from you. Is it true that you are a lady filling in as or working towards a part as an executive or screenwriter? What do you think about the proposition for half of all open subsidizing to go to female-drove ventures by 2020?

You can impart your story to us by rounding out the structure beneath, and we'll utilize some of what you let us know as a feature of our scope.

Word is that the turn out may be 40% - and obviously you are likewise choosing GLA individuals. In Glasgow once upon a time, Jim Sillars thought he was sure to win Govan again yet a purposeful exertion by Labor, and eminently the 'group Sarwar' saw each potential vote in favor of Mohammed Sarwar prepared and he won the seat.

With every one of the positives and thoroughly considered strategies originating from Sian and Caroline and the schoolboy play area battles from the principle male hopefuls would we be able to be so completely beyond any doubt that it will be a 2-horse race? Wouldn't it truly shake things up for one of the young ladies to annoy the apple truck?

Put it all on the line London (I'm wanting to do my bit in Scotland - 3 votes in favor of me today and I'll be joined by an entire tranche of 16-17 year-olds who get the opportunity to vote in favor of MSP's as well). So give a granny a croggy down to the surveys and ensure that each cyclist holding up at the lights on Blackfriars Bridge or the 1500+/hour that spill out from Waterloo get reminded to Vote - for CleanAir Cycling and other Competent arrangements!

Not picking a leader on the second vote is a squandered vote. So accepting you vote in favor of your inclination between Goldsmith or Khan on the second vote, you can thoroughly enjoy your extravagant on the principal vote.

Be that as it may, you comprehend what, i'm simply going to wrap the entire thing up with a gigantic spoiler. What's the purpose of a Mayor at any rate? An excessive amount of force put resources into an individual is terrible for majority rule government and on the off chance that everything turns out badly there is no chance to get out until 2020. The chose get together have no control over the Mayor, other than 66% can attempt and induce him (sorry it'll be a "him") to make a financial plan cut here or there. The get together is just there to investigate and they have no force of their own; no energy to speak to the general population that voted in favor of them; no energy to care for Londoners' interests.

"Straightforwardly chose Mayor" may seem like a move for better popular government yet the fact of the matter is a remarkable inverse. On the off chance that you cast your brain back to 1998, the London Mayor was centerpiece of Tony Blair's protected changes, he announcing, the London Mayor would be the most intense legislator outside Westminster.

After the GLC's destruction, Londoners were never given a possibility for improved organization other than the mayoralty we are screwed over thanks to today. In any case, what London needs today is an appropriate gathering with declined authoritative force and a majority rule get together ready to advance and vote on strategy whenever; a get together that can sack or select a pioneer whenever; a get together that answers straightforwardly to the general population of London that voted in favor of it and to whom it serves.

Voice your challenge tomorrow. Compose SPOIL at the highest point of your pink vote and be checked.

I'm really sorry to learn it, Greens and other minority parties, yet the last time you had any force in London was under the arrangement hit with an autonomous Ken Livingstone in 2000. Going ahead all that remaining parts at the GLA is a regularly reducing political debating stage. Going ahead the main genuine prospect of changing London is to battle, illuminating Londoners of the truth and the need to scrap the mayoralty.

I experienced childhood with a committee bequest in south London, my father was a transport driver and my mum sewed garments to get additional cash. My folks buckled down and could set aside and purchase a home for our family.

Be that as it may, Londoners today confront an altogether different viewpoint.

Our city is surviving the most exceedingly bad lodging emergency in an era, rents are high as can be and the normal expense of a home in London is more than £500,000. Rather than building new homes, the present leader has over and again missed targets, and moderate home building is currently at its least level subsequent to 2008.

On the off chance that I get to be leader of London, my single greatest need will be to fabricate thousands more homes each year. I will set an objective to make half of all the new homes that are assembled really moderate, with first dibs for Londoners.

More than one in four Londoners now lives in private leased settlement – that is two million individuals over our city. I will build up a London Living Rent, in light of 33% of normal wages, and work to handle rebel proprietors.

Londoners now confront the most costly transport of any real city. I will solidify charges for a long time, and present "Container" transport tickets, so individuals can have boundless changes inside 60 minutes.

While the typical cost for basic items in London has taken off, the quantity of cops making our city safe has dove. Moderate cuts mean there are 1,500 less officers on London's lanes, and brutal wrongdoing levels are up in each and every precinct. I will make policing a need, and work to handle rapes on open transport and the unsatisfactory ascent in disdain wrongdoing.

As somebody who lives with grown-up onset asthma I know how terrible air quality in the capital has ended up. I need to be the greenest leader London has ever had – it is not worthy that 10,000 individuals bite the dust in London consistently on the grounds that our air is so squalid. That is the reason I have driven arrangements to make green London's transport armada and expel the filthiest vehicles from our streets.

Londoners have an unmistakable decision on Thursday, they can alter the course our city is going in.

I am requesting that they pick trust over trepidation, to pick change over business as usual, and to vote in favor of me to be a leader for all Londoners.

I'm remaining for leader to secure the achievement we've seen under Boris and to make it work for all Londoners.

What I offer is a completely supported activity arrangement for Greater London: more homes, better transport, cleaner air and more secure lanes, all paid for while solidifying mayoral committee charge.

Keeping Londoners safe is the main obligation of the leader. It's the reason I've promised to put 500 more cops on the tube, paid for through TfL reserve funds. Also, it's the reason I've upheld the Met police's solicitation to increment outfitted reaction vehicles in London.

I will ensure London's vehicle spending plan, so you can get the chance to deal with time. Excessively numerous London workers continue conditions that would not be took into account ranch creatures, and in the event that we don't contribute and redesign the system, London will basically come to a standstill. My adversary Sadiq Khan's arrangement to cut £1.9bn from London's vehicle spending plan will destroy for suburbanites.

For excessively numerous Londoners, the fantasy of getting the keys to their first home has turned into a dream. The main way we'll settle the lodging emergency is to assemble more homes, which is the reason I will twofold house-working to 50,000 a year, without cementing over our green spaces. What's more, I will ensure new homes based on open area are for Londoners.

What's more, as a deep rooted earthy person, I'm resolved to make London the greenest city on Earth. I will tidy up our transports and taxicabs, get more Londoners cycling and put resources into pocket parks, so everybody has admittance to the outside. I will ensure that Heathrow development is off the table for good, while setting up an arrangement to make London the world's initial zero-waste city.

My activity arrangement is conveyed by getting the most ideal arrangement from this administration, on which London depends for the greater part of its forces and financing.

At the last race, my constituents supported me with the greatest expanded larger part of any MP, since I stayed faithful to my commitments. I will do likewise for Londoners.

It is baffling – without a doubt – that this mayoral crusade has been commanded by lines about identities instead of approach. Why haven't we been debating who has the better arrangement to deal with the lodging emergency; or to make open transport less expensive; or to handle the air contamination executing Londoners?

London needs to work for everybody – not only the fortunate few who can stand to detach themselves from the issues confronting generally Londoners.

The Liberal Democrats have a positive and eager vision for a superior London. Radical and practical, a Liberal London would be more pleasant and greener, made conceivable on the grounds that it is more secure.

From slicing wrongdoing to keeping admissions low, empowering world-class instruction and better childcare for every one of our kids, and building a large number of new homes, the Liberal Democrats have genuine answers for the capital's greatest difficulties.

We can handle London's lodging emergency with an Olympic push to assemble new homes, by contributing billions acknowledged by proceeding with the Olympic Games statute to manufacture 50,000 chamber homes to lease and 150,000 available to be purchased or for private rent, including rent-to-purchase for first time purchasers – with a City Hall building organization and an aptitudes institute to prepare development specialists.http://mehndidesignimages.tblogz.com/mehndi-designs-images-in-pdf-graphic-design-tips-bang-on-for-logo-design-46062 We can take action against maverick proprietors who rip off private inhabitants by expanding obligatory enrollment and offering long occupancies, checking uncalled for letting specialist expenses and give occupants additional rights when landowners offer up. We can modernize admissions for adaptable working with reduced cost tube, DLR and TfL Overground charges before 7.30am and a one-hour transport ticket.

With eight years on the London Assembly I am the main mayoral hopeful with the experience of working in City Hall to enhance the lives of Londoners. While alternate hopefuls discuss their thoughts for London, just I.

No comments:

Post a Comment